Why is it people think Christians hate Muslims?

I just had someone trying to yank my chain, baiting me to criticize someone for being a Muslim Fundamentalist.

 Rest assured, the bible does not advocate anyone to hate other people. God mentions the fact that He hates a few things — all of them actions and attitudes, but not people. And, He specifically instructs his followers to “love your enemy.”

Love, by the definition used in the Greek of that passage, is an action word — a verb. It means that those who call themselves Believers and seek after God are to act in the following manner when dealing with God, others, and themselves: 

They are to be patient, kind, not envious, not boastful or proud, not rude, not self-seeking, and not easily angered. They aren’t supposed to think about or plan how they’re going to hurt or do wrong to others, nor take any delight when wrong befalls others.  They’re supposed to be happy when honesty and sincerity result in the protection and preservation of someone’s dignity. And they’re supposed to hold fast to the belief that all things work for good.

A true Christian knows he or she can never live up to such high standards, and so does God. But true believers know they are to strive toward these things.

Sadly, because Christians will always fall short of these things, those that don’t understand the grace and mercy of God will mock and criticize true believers.  They simply don’t “get” what God is all about.

Yet, because people don’t like to be perceived as not knowing something, these same people will insist that they DO understand God.  They, like everyone else, naturally want to feel good about themselves, not deficient in some form of understanding.

Believers certainly can’t (and shouldn’t) fault them for that. Believers want to feel good about themselves, too. The difference between the two is that Believers know God accepts them in spite of their shortcomings.  The non-Believer does not know this – at least not in the depth of his or her being. Cognitively they might give assent to it (and often do), but in the depths of the Affective realm, that deep relationship isn’t there.

I can speak with experience on this, as I did not seek out and establish that depth of relationship until later in life.  It was easy to say I had a relationship with God. But, like skiing, parasailing, snorkeling, riding a bike, or driving a car, you can say you understand it without actually doing it. But, after you actually do it, you look back and realize how very litle you knew, despite whatever braggadocio occurred beforehand.

Now I will wholeheartedly agree that many who call themselves Believers act in hateful ways. They may even actually hate. But let it be known that they are falling prey to a shortsightedness, and not at all acting in accordance with God’s instruction to “love your enemy.”  I know, because I am guilty of not following the above commands when I get shortsighted.

It is when this happens that the non-Believers mock.

But, to readers who are Believers, I would challenge anyone to show me in the New Testament where God instructs us to retaliate or verbally blast against such actions.

And herein lies the bait that some set up between Christians and Muslims.  A true, bible-believing Christian is supposed to love his or her enemy.  And with tolerance, live among those who do not believe the same way as them.  It is our instruction.

To the best of my knowledge, the Muslims that I know do the same for me.  I have had none try to kill me, nor blow up my car, nor anything else.  In other words, so long as ”love” (that patience and kindness thing described above) is at the core of the relationship, everything is fine.  Fundamentalist Muslims can be fundamentalist Muslims.

What creates the controversy is when people who are MILITANT Muslims start to kill those who are not Muslim.  This killing of innocents is what is unacceptable for any human being, yes?

What “religion” or “form of government” (Islam is both) advocates the general population start killing off those who do not believe the same?  (Please don’t get me started on any rabbit trail here — I will save my criticism of the American government for another post.)

Armed conflicts that are classified as “war” are to involve uniformed soldiers.  The Geneva convention addressed that.  War between formal armies is war. But what is being baited before Believers, however, is that they “hate” the Muslims who kill innocent lives.

Two points here:

#1. I’m curious why those who bait Christians never taunt the Militant Muslims about their hate for Christians.

My personal belief as to why they don’t is because the Militant Muslims are living according to their code: To hate and to kill. Therefore, there is no contradiction — so no need for a taunt.

But the Christian who displays a violent outburst at seeing innocent people killed (non-military / non-uniformed people) is taunted because they have become shortsighted. Their angry is justified, but they act in ways contrary to God’s instruction (be angry and sin not). Again, they are acting against their code.  As a result, non-Believers see hypocricy and they mock and taunt.

Oh, that the non-Believers would come to realize the depth of the grace and mercy of God.  Their mocking and taunting would fade and their heart would become like the heart of God; sorrowful for the one choosing to act out of line with God’s instruction.

#2.  I’m curious why those who taunt Christians don’t get equally upset with Militant Muslims who think it’s okay to keep killing innocent people.  Just because it’s in their code to kill the infidels, is that supposed to make it okay –  because they’re living up to their code?

Such logic would be unstable.

In closing, we often see true Believers speaking out to correct those who call themselves Believers but act antithetically to the instruction from God to love Him, our neighbors, and ourselves. But it’s WE, the Believers, who see it, not the non-Believers. It’s often done quiety, and respectfully, as instructed above. But the news media will never pick that stuff up and broadcast it because it’s not controversial and sensational enough to attract viewers, listeners, and readers.

I could only hope that Fundamentalist (non-Militant) Muslims are striving to correct those who are Militant, and kill innocent lives just because someone believes differently.  I can only hope and pray that someone is trying to talk sense to them about the value of human life.

By the way, in case you’re curious, I do not consider myself to be a Fundamentalist Christian.  Such a term has so many different meanings to so many people, and yet we do not see it in the Word of God.  Therefore, to me it is nothing but a label used to invoke controversy. 

Following the Greatest Commandment of God, to love Him, and the second greatest commandment, to love my ‘neighbors’ as myself, is what will define me.  I invite you to return to the clear definition I outlined above if you would like clarification of what that means.

A debate call for Al Gore

It appears someone of high stature is willing to call Al Gore to a debate, and make it as international and as public as it can be.  The letter sent to Al’s private residence (and made open to the public) is straightforward enough, but I love the statement made by the challenger, the Viscount Monckton of Brenchley:

“A careful study of the  substantial corpus of peer-reviewed science reveals that Mr. Gore’s film, An  Inconvenient Truth, is a foofaraw of pseudo-science, exaggerations, and errors, now being peddled to innocent schoolchildren worldwide.”

It appears that the former policy advisor to (then) Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher believes that when science is applied, the light on Gore’s position becomes quite dim.

Read more about it if you like.   

Wash Your Hands of the Global Warming Debate

What makes your humble blogger Lave sus Manos an expert in global warming?  Nothing.

What makes Al Gore an expert in global warming? Nothing.

What the difference between the two? 

Al Gore has LOTS of money and political power, a big famous name, and a publicity machine. And because of all that he’s much better than Lave sus Manos at manipulating the emotions of the masses.  THAT’s the difference!

A good salesperson knows that people buy on emotion but justify their purchase by logic.  Al Gore knows that if he plays on people’s emotion (predominately guilt and fear in this case), he can get them to “buy into” his position as he (allegedly) justifies it by logic.

But There’s a Problem:
Many of the world’s climatologists disagree wholeheartedly with Al Gore. They say his logic is based on false assumptions. Are they right? Maybe. Maybe not.

But – - – because the climatologists also do not have political power, big names, big money, and a big publicity machine, they cannot manipulate public opinion like Al can.

Follow the money. Follow the ego (Al’s).  Follow a former Vice President’s desire for a legacy.  Al Gore makes good money promoting global warming – (you think he gives these speeches for free?).  Al Gore gets to rub shoulders with Hollywood’s elite and his name stays before the public eye.  He did, after all, want to be president. He wants his name in the history books. So when someone said to him “let’s make a movie and we’ll associate your name with it,” my guess is Al saw a second chance at fame and fortune.

Another problem: 
All this focus on global warming is stirring of the public’s emotions — and serves as an excellent distraction from the real issues at hand.

How Open-Minded Are You?
If you’re open-minded you look at both sides of an issue, do you not?  So if you’ve given time to listen to Al Gore, then give time to what some of these climatologists and geologists say.  They are, after all, – unlike Al Gore or your humble blogger Lave sus Manos — learned in their respective sciences.  

Don’t listen to me.
Don’t listen to Al.
Listen with an open mind to what both sides are saying.

Peruse The Great Global Warming Debate
Look at the history of climate change in the world (be sure to scroll down)
Check out the animation of geologic shift through the ages from UC Berkeley
And spend some time on the science page of globalwarming.org

I’m not advocating that we pollute our planet or waste energy.  What I’m saying is that many of these experts estimate that only 2% of the currently rise in temperatures is due to man’s action.  So be wise and act accordingly, but don’t get all guilt-ridden that you’re destroying the planet by using your lawn mower.

If you’re really concerned about the future of the planet and you want to exercise your emotions, then get angry about the powerful few getting rich playing both sides of almost every regional armed conflict (which causes the senseless death of millions of people and needlessly devastates innocent families). In many cases these powerful few actually foster and prod these conflicts so they can pad their own pockets and feed their egos.

In other words, wash your hands of misguided guilt and fear.  Instead pray that these hidden power groups be slowed, halted, and even thwarted.

When you gotta wash, you gotta wash.

Sometimes we just need to wash our hands of certain situations and/or feelings.  And we should also wash our hands before we take hold of clean things — such as the truth.

This blog is for letting go of falsehoods (washing our hands of them), as well as pointing out the things that are true, but often hidden from view. Often the truth has been placed behind some form of purposeful deception.

If you wish to comment, feel free. 

If you wish to address a topic or start a conversation on some issue not listed, just let me know. 

Published in:  on March 4, 2007 at 7:21 pm Leave a Comment